Review: Batman Arkham Asylum
Permalink | e-postala! 1 comments
Read more>>
Boredom + Coffee = This.
I'd finish it, but I think the joke runs dry at the 50 second mark anyway.
Permalink | e-postala! 8 comments
Read more>>
Blog of Unimportance 2: Electric Bigaloo!
Also, if your a student of either Fort Street High School or Hurlstone Agricultural, you might wanna check out The Fort vs The Farm, where the two schools battle it out in a humble game of Team Fortress 2 for an awesome prize of absolutely nothing but bragging rights.
Either way, there's no Megan Fox here to be found, so consider this post terminated.
Permalink | e-postala! 1 comments
Read more>>
Game Theory: A Stunning Revelation.
- Heavy co-operative play designed levels, that require you and the 3 other survivors to cooperate as a team
- The AI “Director”, that decides where and where hordes of zombies spawn
- The fact that it’s made by Valve.
Everyone seems to love L4D. I can understand why. Who wouldn’t like shoving hot, hot lead up a zombie’s face with 3 of their best friends? But to me it just kinda seems repetitive. To help me with explaining why I think it’s repetitive, I’ll compare it to another loved Valve game of mine, Team Fortress 2, which I've managed to spend over 200 hours on.
Team Fortress 2 is comparable to a game of chess. Each team starts of with an equal amount of players, and each time must simply complete the objective to win. There is a numerous amountsof objectives, including Capture the Control Point, Capture the Intel (Flag), Capture the Control Point While At the Same Time Defending Yours, Kill the Other Team or Capture the Point, or Capture the Control Point by Push an Explosives-Filled Cart Along A Track That Unorthodoxly Leads To a Hole Full Of Oil Drums and Other Explosive Properties That Just Happens to be Right In Front of The Enemy Base.
Aside from Arena mode (Kill the Other Team or Capture the Point), the way you get to completing the objective in TF2 attributes to it’s addictive nature. The unpredictability of what classes your opponents have chosen, Sentry placement, etc which forces you to alter your tactics accordingly makes sure that no two games are the same.
Left 4 Dead, on the other hand, has fairly linear level design, unlike TF2's open levels with multiple pathways.An example of a gameplan in TF2 is Capture Capture Point A first while a Scout keeps people at Capture Point B busy, and finally capture Point C while the on the strong momentum. Going to Point A to Point B while shooting x amount of zombies is all L4D has to offer on all levels. It’s far too repetitive. Sure, the special infected and the Director try their best to catch you off guard, but they ultimately fall flat in offering the same amount of unpredictability in TF2.
If only there was some combination between the two...
...excuse me while I clean up the mess I just made.
There are a lot of other gripes I have with the game, but that’s for another time for another article.
And yes, I’m aware of L4D2. And Survival Mode, which I'll cover soon.
I don't know who made the Team 4Tress pic, so if anyone wants to claim ownership they can.
Permalink | e-postala! 9 comments
Read more>>
Response to a response: Shuffling Videos
Dear Anonymouse,
I never criticised people based on their skill at shuffling, nor did I criticise their intentions in making these videos. I have no intention on learning how to shuffle, because to me, shuffling is but metaphorical feces on pop culture, primarily for the very reasons I get into in this and the previous rant. The main critisism I had for the hundreds of thousands of them was that the vast majority of them were basically carbon copies of each other.
Not all shuffling videos are necessarily bad, this one is a perfect example of a shuffling video done right. It's decently edited, has watchable quality, has video descriptions and titles that don't look spelled by a dyslexic without a caps lock/shift key, and furthermore, IS ORIGINAL. Unlike
this one, this one and this one. Unfortunately, most shuffling videos are akin to the latter three, and a very small percentage are made with as much quality as the first one.
Lastly, your arguments seem to contradict each other. You say that people make videos to receive critisism, get popular, etc. You then say that you do not edit a video if you deem is as unimportant, and random. I fail to see the logic in this. Why would one not put any effort into something they want to leave an impression on people? I may have read this wrong, if I did, writing your comments more coherently could help.
That is all.
Permalink | e-postala! 5 comments
Read more>>
Shortie: Shuffling videos.
"Oh hey look at this shuffling video, the guy who uploaded it didn't bother to edit out him/herself turning the camera off nor did he/she use proper punctuation or grammar in her video description and name. It's so rad, I think I'm going to favourite it and tell all my friends about it who likewise will also favourite it."
Honestly, I've yet to see a shuffling video that doesn't revel in its own pretentiousness.
That is all.
Permalink | e-postala! 3 comments
Read more>>